Relative dating the rocks

10-Sep-2020 02:05

The boundary between the two represents a time gap of nearly 300 million years.[SE ] Figure 8.9 The four types of unconformities: (a) a nonconformity between non-sedimentary rock and sedimentary rock, (b) an angular unconformity, (c) a disconformity between layers of sedimentary rock, where the older rock has been eroded but not tilted, and (d) a paraconformity where there is a long period (millions of years) of non-deposition between two parallel layers.So we can infer that coal seam is younger than the faults (because it disrupts them), and of course the upper sandstone is youngest of all, because it lies on top of the coal seam.Exercise 8.1 Cross-Cutting Relationships The outcrop shown here (at Horseshoe Bay, B. Buff/pink felsic intrusive igneous rock present as somewhat irregular masses trending from lower right to upper left 2. A 50 cm wide light-grey felsic intrusive igneous dyke extending from the lower left to the middle right – offset in several places Using the principle of cross-cutting relationships outlined above, determine the relative ages of these three rock types.Unlike relative time, absolute time assigns specific ages to events or formations and is typically recorded in years before present.This process requires much more sophisticated chemical analysis and, although other processes have been developed, often utilizes the decay rates of radioactive isotopes to determine the age of a given material.With this in mind geologist have long known that the deeper a sedimentary rock layer is the older it is, but how old?

To deal with many of these problems geologists utilize two types of geologic time: relative time and absolute time.This means that a quartz sandstone deposited 500 million years ago will look very similar to a quartz sandstone deposited 50 years ago.

Dating should be fun, and the less complicated the better.… continue reading »

Read more